API Endpoint Naming Review
Check consistency against chosen conventions; export an exception list.
A clear result starts here
Add your input or try the worked example.
Using API Endpoint Naming Review
Check consistency against chosen conventions; export an exception list.
- Use Try example to explore api endpoint naming review, or enter your own endpoints csv / json.
- Set path convention, allowed static segments, one per line. Read the field notes for supported values.
- Choose Review input and inspect the result, including any review flags or unsupported cases.
- Use the relevant download buttons to keep your result. CSV and report JSON preserve the available findings; original files are not changed.
Example
Endpoints CSV / JSON: method,path
GET,/users/{id}
POST,/GetUsers
GET,/orderItems
GET,/health
get,/users?page=2
Path convention: lower-kebab
Allowed static segments, one per line: health
login
logoutQuestions & answers
What does API Endpoint Naming Review do?
Check consistency against chosen conventions; export an exception list.
What input does this tool support?
Endpoints CSV / JSON: Columns: method,path. Path convention. Allowed static segments, one per line
What should I check before using the result?
Checks a chosen naming convention, not whether an API is RESTful, secure or correctly implemented. Singular nouns and action routes can be valid project-specific exceptions.
Can I keep or share the result?
Yes. Use the result-specific downloads, CSV where available and report JSON. Downloads can contain your supplied information, so review the content before sharing. Processing runs in this browser; public pages also include the site’s approved advertising and optional analytics.
Help improve this tool
Report a problem or suggest an improvement
Describe the issue without pasting private tool input. Feedback goes to our admin inbox.
